Talk:Fuzzbee Morse

Creation
I created this page for Fuzzbee Morse however I could not find, for the life of me, (at thiss moment at least) anything about him personally; Such as his date of birth etc. Any contributions will be more than welcome. Thanks, --Jefuab (talk) 17:19, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Hang On
Look, What is this? Haven't I got enough references to justify this page? The page has the right to be on wikipedia because Fuzzbee Morse is a reasonable unknown yet quite successful member of the film music industry. I want to know why this is up for deletion- Sorry, Speedy deletion. Please, someone inform me of this. I'm open to it and, if I think that your reasoning is justified, I will quite happily stand aside and let it happen. --Jefuab (talk) 18:18, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I agree with you. While the article needs improvement, it certainly does indicate the notability of its subject.  Alas, I'm not an admin, so I can't do anything about it, but I doubt this will be followed through. AJCham2097 (talk) 18:42, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

==Notice: This article does not verifiably establish == In my opinion, this article either does not verifiably satisfy the Notability criteria for, or it may violate the Conflict of interest guideline, or perhaps it is a Copyright violation.

Wikipedia articles must be based on reliable sources to verify any claims of notability. Even though the lack of reliable sources in an article is not grounds for deletion in itself, an article with absolutely no sources (or only external links to unreliable ones) suggests to some editors that multiple reliable sources may not, in fact, exist.

Although I am considering tagging this article for deletion according to the Deletion policy, perhaps User:, or other recent contributors to this article, will make some constructive improvements to it ... I do not have time to examine this article in depth at the moment, and it may improve over time, in which case this warning was premature.

Please respond on this Discussion page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation.

To better understand why I have used this template, please read Flag templates for deletion warnings ... I realize that some of the expressed possible concerns may not be appropriate in this case.

Happy Editing! &mdash;  02:15, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

I don't really understand what it is that makes this article a violation of anything. I have not, at this point in time, read what I have been advised to read, but from where my eyes are there is nothing wrong with the article other than the fact that it needs quite a bit of development. --Jefuab (talk) 11:38, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Category:Flagged articles
I have removed the  from the message above . it was flagged at least two months ago by Some Other Editor, but the current version looks OK to me. Avic enna sis @ 06:14, 8 April 2010 (UTC)