Talk:G&D's Ice Cream Cafe

Page move
Suggest moving this page to "G&D's" or "G&D's ice cream cafes". 'George and Davis' only refers to the Little Clarendon Street shop; both George and Danver and George and Davis are part of teh same chain/company/whatever, and most importantly everyone refers to G&D's as G&D's. Stannered 18:16, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for your suggestion. I am most grateful as I am feeling extremely frustrated at the moment. How do I do that? I would very much appreciate your assistance in this matter. The goal is to simply render the article truthful and accurate. 71.181.63.135 (talk) 11:53, 7 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Ok, it's been over a year now, according to their web site, they are G&D's, name should be changed to that, so i will be updating it, cheers ∞ Moebiusuibeom-en (talk) 18:58, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Davis Roberts
PeaceThruSuperiorFirepower, first of all welcome to Wikipedia. Please take a look at WP:CITE, Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. Claims such as "I was there", whilst they may be true, can be made by anyone regardless of the truth; it is completely unverifiable. As you have challenged the factoid that the shop was named after George and his dog, I've removed it from the article pending finding verifiable sources for the information. If you can find a citation from a reliable source regarding the Davis Roberts theory, you of course are welcome to add your information back to the article. Thanks, Stannered (talk) 11:11, 6 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Regardless of whether Davis Roberts was involved in setting up G&D's, what he has done since is of no relavence. If he was involved, then it would be appropriate to have a citation that says so; see Verifiability. Stannered (talk) 16:18, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Opening times
An unusual thing about G&Ds is that it's open until midnight (source). I think it's notable enough to warrant inclusion, partly because it's an unusual practice for a British cafe, and partly because it's been a contributing factor to the cafe's success over the years. Whereabouts in the article could it be mentioned, though? Ubermammal (talk) 16:40, 6 April 2008 (UTC)


 * I agree it should be included; personally I'd put it at the end of the first paragraph in the History section. Stannered (talk) 18:47, 6 April 2008 (UTC)