Talk:Géza Anda

fading reputation
you write: "But since his death in 1976 at the age of fifty-four his high reputation has faded somewhat from view."

Be carefull with a view, which might be true only form the point of view of a far-away-province!

Geza Anda is today, with all the interpretations documented on CD, far away from a "somewhat fading out reputation", but simply considered as one of the very important CREATORS of Interpretations of European Music.

rainer boesch

Shame this great artist has such a shoddy Wikepedia page. Can I amend it,with,for instance, Gramaphone reviews of his recordings? His Bartok and Mozart recordings are cannon, like Brendel's Schubert, Gilel's Brahms concerti and Kleiber's Beethoven Symphonies. --RainerBoesch 11:17, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

David Murphy I also find this subjective comment, meaningless on close analysis, serves only as padding in the introduction. I feel strongly this sentence should be deleted as forming a partial and subjective view not fit for purpose in a Wikipedia article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.1.166.134 (talk) 13:01, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Translation into Chinese Wikipedia
The 08:03, 11 May 2010 Clover999 version of this article is translated into Chinese Wikipedia to expand an existing stub.--Wing (talk) 19:03, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Unsupported claims - citations needed
"considered to be a tremendous interpreter of Beethoven, Schumann, Brahms and Bartók." "In his heyday he was regarded as an amazing artist, possessed of a beautiful, natural and flawless technique that gave his concerts a unique quality." May well be true, after listening to him a little, but need attributions for these claims. Michaelmross (talk) 11:47, 10 July 2023 (UTC)