Talk:G-Spot amplification

Prod for deletion
I'm prodding this article for deletion because none of the references here show any evidence that this is WP:NOTABLE, and none of the references are WP:RELIABLE SOURCES. Jefffire (talk) 19:31, 10 January 2010 (UTC)


 * I deprodded after finding additional refs at G News Archive:   . There is also one PubMed references:  from an absolutely reliable journal (which calls it "G-spot amplification"). I have changed the title accordingly,.   DGG ( talk ) 04:30, 11 January 2010 (UTC)


 * That is a vast improvement. The previous article just looked like an ad for the company. Jefffire (talk) 20:05, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Like I stated in this edit summary, I "[m]erged G-Spot amplification into [the G-Spot] article as there isn't enough material on the topic, especially medical material, for th[is] article to significantly grow beyond what it was. Not to mention, medical authorities are against the surgery." Flyer22 (talk) 02:55, 7 November 2012 (UTC)