Talk:G.I. Joe: A Real American Hero (Marvel Comics)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 19:56, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:00, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * The lead does not suitably summarise the artcile, see WP:LEAD. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:01, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The prose is good enough, but there are a number of single sentences and short paragraphs which should be concatenated.
 * Expanded the lead. Wasn't sure about citations of material which is cited later, so please let me know if I need to fix anything.  Also changed some things around to combine sentences and paragraphs.  Hopefully it's an improvement.  --Cerebellum (talk) 04:36, 2 March 2011 (UTC)


 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * I believe that the sources are reliable enough and support the cited statements.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Yes
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * ' 'Another early highlight was 1984's "Snake-Eyes: The Origin" Parts I & II, published in issues #26-27. '' Says whom? Needs attribution.
 * ' 'However, it eventually became one of the series' most enduring issues.'' needs a cite, otherwise it is a point of view.
 * Sources added. --Cerebellum (talk) 04:36, 2 March 2011 (UTC)


 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * One image used with an appropriate FUR
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * OK, on hold for seven days. Combine short stray sentences and paragraphs, cite the POV statements, and make the lead a concise summary of the article as per WP:LEAD. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:21, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Fine, that looks good now, happy to pass as GA. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 15:28, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
 * OK, on hold for seven days. Combine short stray sentences and paragraphs, cite the POV statements, and make the lead a concise summary of the article as per WP:LEAD. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:21, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Fine, that looks good now, happy to pass as GA. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 15:28, 2 March 2011 (UTC)