Talk:G.I. Joe: A Real American Hero (Marvel Comics)/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Astrocog (talk · contribs) 22:19, 5 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Sorry - did not forget about this. Very busy lately, so I'll complete the review by Friday.AstroCog (talk) 03:01, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
 * No dablinks - good!
 * A check using the external links tool (on the top-right of this page) shows that a few links have minor issues, but one, the ugo.com Larry Hama interview, is completely dead. Maybe the Way Back Machine has an archive of that? I HIGHLY recommend getting archived versions of any webpages used as sources, which makes them easier to verify.

Editor Comments
Hey! Sorry, I haven't done anything yet, but I do plan to this weekend. Thanks, --Cerebellum (talk) 11:11, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
 * OK lots of stuff fixed, I'm continuing to work on the rest. Regarding your comment on the reception, I've posted a thread at an external forum here to try to find some old reviews. --Cerebellum (talk) 14:04, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Should be all done. Let me know if I missed anything. --Cerebellum (talk) 01:11, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Cerebellum, great work in getting the article back to GA-status! A couple things that I still think need to be addressed are:
 * The intro has some redundancy. Specifically, it mentions being translated into multiple languages more than once. Also, the promotion and characterization sections are summarized sufficiently, but I'm not sure about the others.
 * And now that the info about issue #21 has been moved to the Reception section, the image from issue #21 now seems out of place in the Early Development section. I like the image where it is, but there should probably be a mention of issue #21 there, or the image should be removed.
 * Other than that, the article looks great! I'm happy to make these changes myself, but I though I should mention them here first, so that there's not too much back and forth editing. Please let me know what you think! Fortdj33 (talk) 15:14, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, you are totally right. Please go ahead and make as many changes as you like. --Cerebellum (talk) 01:06, 13 December 2011 (UTC)