Talk:G.I. Joe (IDW Publishing)

Chronological order: original research?
While the chronological comic order is a wonderful resource for readers that prefer to read that way, without a source, it’s original research and belongs on a forum or fan site. Is there a reliable source for this chronological order, or should the section be deleted? —Frungi (talk) 03:55, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm not aware of any source for this; there's a timeline books in the works but I don't believe it's been published yet. --Cerebellum (talk) 19:32, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
 * That can be easily remedied by citing the trade paperback volumes of the comics which themselves contain the issues in chronological order. Just like we cite books for some of the articles. Plastelin (talk) 19:59, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
 * It seems like a serious problem that I had no idea from reading the article that this was the case. Glad to see that it’s resolved. I’ll add a mention of the fact to the text, too. —Frungi (talk) 21:32, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on G.I. Joe (IDW Publishing). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090216081815/http://www.iesb.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=4216&Itemid=99 to http://www.iesb.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=4216&Itemid=99
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130717180131/http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=17962 to http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=17962
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120927074358/http://www.idwpublishing.com:80/news/article/2059 to http://www.idwpublishing.com/news/article/2059/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 17:27, 6 January 2017 (UTC)