Talk:G. D. Falksen

[Untitled]
http://www.dieselpunks.org/profiles/blogs/interview-gd-falksen is another link to work in somewhere. Battlemonk (talk) 04:02, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

If the sections in question for the copyright violation tag would be made known to me, I will work to resolve the issue. Battlemonk (talk) 02:35, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:G.D._Falksen/Temp is the new version. Hopefully avoiding whatever presumed infringement. Battlemonk (talk) 23:41, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Steampunk-falksen.jpg to appear as POTD soon
Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that File:Steampunk-falksen.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on July 31, 2012. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2012-07-31. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! — howcheng  {chat} 17:15, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

POV?
Is it me or is this bio a little bit strong in the way it presents the subject -- as an example: "His large number of articles on the genre have garnered mainstream attention:" Aren't all articles on wikipedia because their subjects 'have garnered mainstream attention'? Also, this quote has a reference to an SF Gate Article (San Fran Chronicle site) where he is among many other people quoted and mentioned. While the article does talk about the mainstreaming of steampunk, it does not do it in the context of saying that GD has garnered mainstream attention, the implication then seems to be that SFGate/The San Fran Chronicle is a 'mainstream' publication and since it's quoting him, hence he has 'garnered mainstream attention'. However, if that is the case, then doesn't it by it's very nature imply that most if not all of the other references are not 'mainstream' sources? Centerone (talk) 02:42, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Expanded lede
The lede for this article needs to be expanded out to at least a paragraph in length. Perhaps someone more versed in the subject could work on citing some of his more popular works, and the importance of the author to the Steampunk genre. A couple more sentences with a quick overview of the history and importance of the subject would go a long way to getting rid of that last maintenance tag. VanIsaacWScontribs 04:11, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 one external links on G. D. Falksen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100507062750/http://www.sfsignal.com:80/archives/2010/03/toc-steampunk-ii-steampunk-reloaded/ to http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2010/03/toc-steampunk-ii-steampunk-reloaded/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081231112100/http://www.marieclaire.it:80/magazine/mondi-nuovi/nuove-tribu to http://www.marieclaire.it/Magazine/mondi-nuovi/Nuove-tribu

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 12:56, 25 February 2016 (UTC)