Talk:G.ho.st

Do not delete this article - it was previously incorrectly deleted and this was overturned by a Deletion Review http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:DRV#28_June_2007. Notability has been established. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.65.228.49 (talk • contribs)
 * Notability can be questioned at any time. This article will only be deleted if consensus is established at the AfD - if not, it will remain. Ian ¹³  /t  15:02, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Why should this article be deleted. For notability, see the external references (there are many more in mainstream press besides the ones listed here). I can tell you that G.ho.st won one of ten ComputerWorld Horizon Awards this year. Googling G.ho.st returns 100,000 results. All competitors have wikipedia pages. Previously the article was deleted and this was overturned in a deletion review. Why would it be deleted again? Thanks Zvis 17:47, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
 * This exact subject is what is being debated. Please see the AfD linked from the main article. Ian ¹³  /t  20:07, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Should this page really be named G.ho.st? They have changed the name of the product to Ghost.cc what I can see. Fredrikc (talk) 15:30, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on G.ho.st. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for https://www.bloomberg.com/bw/stories/2007-12-27/tech-startup-bridges-mideast-dividebusinessweek-business-news-stock-market-and-financial-advice
 * Corrected formatting/usage for https://aws.amazon.com/items/1641
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3395852,00.htm
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.economist.com/node/14098321
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091218032931/http://ghost.cc/ to http://ghost.cc/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 10:57, 9 October 2017 (UTC)