Talk:GBK (character encoding)

2007-02-1 Automated pywikipediabot message
--CopyToWiktionaryBot 13:28, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Official Code Tables?
Does anyone know of any official coding tables? Implementations differ on details and how many characters are covered. &mdash;Długosz —Preceding unsigned comment added by Długosz (talk • contribs) 10:22, February 5, 2007
 * i took a look at http://www.iana.org/assignments/charset-reg/GBK which seems to make microsofts code page 936 the authoritive definition of GBK at least as far as the IANA is concerned. The "Relationship to other encodings" in this article speaks as if there is some other defintion of GBK which in some way differs from the MS one but does not actually define what that is. http://h30097.www3.hp.com/docs/base_doc/DOCUMENTATION/V51_HTML/MAN/MAN5/0020____.HTM meanwhile claims that "GBK is therefore defined as a normative annex of GB13000.1-93.". This article is getting an accuracy tag until this issue is resolved. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Plugwash (talk • contribs) 21:12, March 15, 2007

AFAICT GBK has always been defined as identical to Microsoft 936. Of course this varies from gb2312. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.107.0.73 (talk • contribs) 17:50, May 21, 2007

Since the article now contains the reference to the Chinese standard defining GBK, Plugwash's accuracy tag is no longer appropriate, and I'm removing it. When I have a moment, I'll add a note on what the differences between GBK and CP 936 are. JCBradfield (talk) 19:35, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

external links as of 2015 Sept 9
GBK(5) HP link obsolete, error message http://h30097.www3.hp.com/docs/base_doc/DOCUMENTATION/V51_HTML/MAN/MAN5/0020____.HTM — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.105.160.157 (talk) 10:27, 9 September 2015 (UTC)