Talk:GFTP

gFTP on cygwin
Someone more familiar with Cygwin & apps should comment on running gFTP under windows. I originally posted CyGNOME, including gFTP 2.0.14. There was a comment that It appears the gFTP port for Windows never went anywhere; the Cygnome site was last updated in 2004 and has nothing about gFTP now. The comment is partially correct--CyGNOME is no longer in development. But there IS a gFTP port on the sourceforge project page for download. I replaced the link to CyGNOME-2, including gFTP 2.0.16. CyGNOME-2 is also no longer in development. The GNOME libraries now ship with Cygwin, but I don't know if gFTP is part of it & don't know the preferred way to run gFTP under win32. -- Karnesky 22:10, 19 November 2005 (UTC)

windows?
are you sure? --83.190.205.33 04:57, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 * see the note, above, and the article text re. Cygwin. --Karnesky 05:40, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Project status
An anonymous user has twice made changes, claiming that the project is inactive. There were changes to the SVN trunk just two days ago, so this not only constitutes WP:OR, but is just plain wrong. --Karnesky 06:46, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Actually, no, what I said the second time was:

Although there is some level of developer activity in gFTP's CVS repositories, over 2 years have passed without a new release of the application. The current version was released in February of 2005, and there are currently no scheduled alpha or beta releases for the project.

That is 100% factual and supported by the project's own web pages. So this is wrong:

this not only constitutes WP:OR

...and this is false:

but is just plain wrong.

24.229.190.185 16:53, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I admit I was mistaken about what you added the second time. However, I fail to see why this belongs in the article.  It still reads with bias to me & still hints at stagnation.  A LOT of apps go more than two years between releases.  gFTP, like many apps, has not had a release schedule (so that no plans on alpha/beta releases is a red herring).  Since there have been no reliable secondary sources which have commented on stagnancy, I do still think this is OR--you're cherry-picking first-hand data to imply a conclusion which you independently arrived at. --Karnesky 17:18, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Userbox
If you use this application you can add this userbox to your userpage:

- Ahunt (talk) 11:27, 25 April 2009 (UTC)