Talk:GLaDOS/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: PerryPerryD (talk · contribs) 17:43, 27 October 2022 (UTC) I am PerryPerryD and I will be performing this review. I accept any and all assistance from other editors in this review. I will begin as soon as i can. PerryPerryD Talk To Me 17:43, 27 October 2022 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Head verified as good, Layout is efficient, resourceful, and consice. No Typographical Errors found. Follows the Manual of Style. Fiction is a bit difficult here, but after a thorough analysis, I confirmed that it passes Fiction. Approved.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * Headbomb Reliability Script assisted, unreliable sources point to reviews or quotes, therefor reliable. Manually checked sources. Approved. PerryPerryD  Talk To Me 18:40, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Article is able to describe the characters backstory without going to far. into it. Its able to describe the character and not focus on the game itself. It is broad, yet doesnt have more than what it needs. Approved.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Self Fixed Head Neutrality. PerryPerryD Talk To Me 18:48, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Venus illustation may not be needed for the context or to support the claim of this article. Image reassesed. Image supports the article. Approved.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Very impressive. The article passes all of the criteria as far as I can tell after 4 days of analysis. Approved for GA. Congratulations. PerryPerryD  Talk To Me 15:36, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Very impressive. The article passes all of the criteria as far as I can tell after 4 days of analysis. Approved for GA. Congratulations. PerryPerryD  Talk To Me 15:36, 7 November 2022 (UTC)