Talk:GMC Envoy

2002 Engine Models
The first engine listed under the 2002 heading is dated from 2003 to 2004. I think the the LL8 4.2 I6 started in 2002, which is probably what the author meant as the heading is for 2002. If the engine range started in 2003, that would mean Envoys in 2002 had no engines. mlhwitz 04:04, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Weasel words and more
I didn't run a trace, but strangely, it doesn't look like GM edited this article. Oh well, axed some weasel words and some NPOV stuff. Yah. Scryer_360 (talk) 04:05, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on GMC Envoy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110910054239/http://consumerguideauto.howstuffworks.com:80/2002-to-2009-gmc-envoy-7.htm to http://consumerguideauto.howstuffworks.com/2002-to-2009-gmc-envoy-7.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 21:34, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Merge Isuzu Ascender into this article
As covered on the Ascender talk page, I propose the Ascender article be merged into this one. The Ascender is effectively an Envoy with minor cosmetic modifications sold by Isuzu in low numbers. It's article is a stub that barely contains any unique information about the Ascender itself, and it's could easily be covered here since very little about the Ascender is unique from the Envoy. Reattacollector (talk) (via public computer) 64.85.150.114 (talk) 17:22, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

I would say maybe, but if that's the route you want to take, it would only make sense to merge in all the GMT 360 vehicles as well. (Ascender, Olds Bravada, TrailBlazer, and Saab 9-7)71.217.156.72 (talk) 01:45, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Closing this proposal for now, as there seems to be no interest in merging all into one, and hence no clear support for the proposal. Klbrain (talk) 04:36, 9 August 2019 (UTC)