Talk:GNU Simpler Free Documentation License

"an idealogical statement."
I added the text regarding Section 0a of the draft licence. I've referred to the section as an "idealogical statement", however I'm a little concerned that this may be a loaded term - another editor might want to consider changing "idealogical" to something more neutral if appropriate. Brendan Cosman 00:25, 6 December 2006 (UTC)


 * No, even the GNU project would freely admit that their project and licenses do have quite idealogical goals. It's not a bad or non-neutral term, though with the passing of time it has apparently had increasingly negative connotations. --Gwern (contribs) 01:18 6 December 2006 (GMT)

Cross licensing?
I read the article, and it says that the GFDL allows cross licensing with the GSFDL if no GSFDL-incompatible features are used. I am sure they mean that the GFDL is compatible with the GSFDL if no GSFDL-incompatible features are used. Emanla Eraton 18:52, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Why does this article exist?
It concerns a proposal, and one that's more than a decade old. Hardly seems noteworthy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.147.155.219 (talk) 08:38, 8 February 2021 (UTC)