Talk:GQ Lupi

Infobox
The use of the infobox OrbitboxOnePlanet instead of OrbitboxPlanet et al. is superior in two ways:
 * 1) The template does not display unnecessary fields with unknown values, which are filled with question marks.
 * 2) The template has the more precise section header "Observed projected separation" instead of the imprecise "Orbital distance" (which is linked to Semimajor axis, definitely incorrect in this case.)
 * Therefore, I believe that the article is clearer if the template OrbitboxOnePlanet is used. Spacepotato (talk) 01:51, 4 July 2008 (UTC)


 * I do agree that this template has its positives. However, this template only worked good for a small amount of pages.  Other than that, I do agree with that you state. —  Nuclear  Vacuum  02:10, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
 * OK, glad that's cleared up. Spacepotato (talk) 02:21, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on GQ Lupi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080507074340/http://www.eso.org/public/outreach/press-rel/pr-2005/pr-09-05.html to http://www.eso.org/public/outreach/press-rel/pr-2005/pr-09-05.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131029204807/http://www.dtm.ciw.edu/boss/planets.html to http://www.dtm.ciw.edu/boss/planets.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 18:05, 9 October 2017 (UTC)