Talk:GRIN Campaign

Factual Incorrectness
the site states that they received over 1000 followers on twitter, however not all are real users, they show no history etc. Also information has reached me (I attend the same school) that the followers are in fact bots or fake accounts. also they say they are a non-profit or charity organisation when they are not actually registered as such. they have not received a grant yet either. Globaladmin001 (talk) 18:31, 26 March 2011 (UTC)


 * In response to the three points that you make: 1000 followers where reached in one week and now there are over 2300, you can check for yourself: http://twitter.com/#!/GRINCampaign These followers do all seem to be real people, it is inevitable that one or two may be bots but @GRINCampaign twitter is not in charge of who followers them and cannot thus be held responsible for some users having no history. I would like to question the validity of rumor here and ask wether it appears in the Wikipedia guidelines as a notable source of information?


 * Your second point, I refer you to the Charity Commissions guidelines on small charities, which GRIN Campaign is compliant with thus making it a non-profit charity. Also, GRIN has in-fact applied for charitable status from HM Revenue & Customs.      http://www.charity-commission.gov.uk/Start_up_a_charity/Do_I_need_to_register/Resources_for_very_small_charities.aspx from which I quote "Charities with less than £5,000 a year do not need to register with the Charity Commission".


 * With regards to the grant the article has been updated to say, "hopes", as indeed the status of the grant is pending. RockClaudiaGB (talk) 15:35, 27 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Your Reply that "@GRINCampaign twitter is not in charge of who followers them and cannot thus be held responsible for some users having no history" is simply not true, looking though a list of people that GRIN follow's shows that many partispate in follow back, meaning that Grin followed them to recive more followers.


 * There are two ways to prove this: Grin follows more people than follow it and the fact that follow back is not avitised on their twitter spream meany they first followed the 'follow backs' and no the other way round 797 —Preceding undated comment added 19:51, 4 April 2011 (UTC).

Blacklisted Links Found on GRIN Campaign
Cyberbot II has detected links on GRIN Campaign which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:


 * http://www.change.org/en-GB/petitions/oxford-english-dictionary-and-microsoft-office-dictionary-include-the-word-transphobia-in-the-dictionary
 * Triggered by  on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 17:05, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Blacklisted Links Found on GRIN Campaign
Cyberbot II has detected links on GRIN Campaign which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:


 * http://www.change.org/en-GB/petitions/oxford-english-dictionary-and-microsoft-office-dictionary-include-the-word-transphobia-in-the-dictionary
 * Triggered by  on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 00:48, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on GRIN Campaign. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140101160359/http://public.oed.com:80/the-oed-today/recent-updates-to-the-oed/june-2013-update/new-words-list-june-2013/ to http://public.oed.com/the-oed-today/recent-updates-to-the-oed/june-2013-update/new-words-list-june-2013/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 23:12, 6 January 2017 (UTC)