Talk:GSD&M/Archives/2012

Fair use rationale for Image:GSDM-logo.png
Image:GSDM-logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:52, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Please remove flag.
This page was flagged for not being neutral. It has since been edited it a great deal. Is there any way we can remove this flag? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.196.162.2 (talk) 16:50, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The advert tag has now been removed, and the content that was removed without explanation has been restored. EagleAg04 (talk)

Can we please remove the flags on this page?
This page has since been edited, and it would be nice to see the flags go down. Idea Citizen (talk) 17:06, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Done. (Except for the Template:Expand tag, which should still be valid) EagleAg04 (talk) 03:55, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: moved. Unopposed for over two weeks. Jenks24 (talk) 07:54, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

GSD& → GSD&M – "Idea City" appears to be no longer in the official name of this agency, but there's already an existing redirect page at GSD&M, so it's my understanding that admin assistance is needed to accomplish this. --Arxiloxos (talk) 06:54, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.