Talk:GTT Communications

Merge Tinet
It was noted that the article on Tinet could be merged here. I would support that, since there is not much content here yet. Having a paragraph on each of the acquisitions might help fill out the history. Some it even in the Tiscali article, which seems to be where it started? W Nowicki (talk) 21:57, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Requested move 19 January 2017

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: Page moved. --  Dane talk  22:19, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Global Telecom & Technology → GTT Communications, Inc. – The company officially changed its name two years ago to GTT Communications, Inc. https://www.gtt.net/press_release/gtt-communications-inc-announces-name-change/ here is a link to the company stock on the NYSE showing the company name: https://www.google.com/finance?cid=718831. This is a video link to Mad Money with Jim Cramer discussing the company https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONYobJgz0QY&t=287s Annmrote (talk) 20:37, 19 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Support. While the old name is still widely used, a quick Google  indicates that the new name recently has slightly wider usage than the old. Andrewa (talk) 15:03, 27 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

"Tiscali International Network" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Tiscali International Network. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:51, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Paid contributions
has disclosed that they are a paid contributor. This article has a significant amount of unreferenced content and an overall promotional tone. -- Mikeblas (talk) 08:58, 12 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Dear Mikeblas,
 * If you think that some parts are too promotional can you please make alternative suggestions.
 * Thank you Dane1977 (talk) 09:26, 12 October 2023 (UTC)