Talk:G 1/19

NPOV
This article appears to be written by the EPO, ignoring the essence of the controversy on this theme.

Members of the EPO Boards of Appeal are no judges and should be careful to observe the limits of authority of a government agency. Rbakels (talk) 17:19, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the criticism. Could you please be more precise? Which part of the article is problematic? Why would the article ignore "the essence of the controversy on this theme"? This case isn't about the independence of the Boards of Appeal. Again, if you can provide additional, reliable sources, I would be happy to improve this article based on those! Cheers --Edcolins (talk) 18:34, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Eye-witness Testimonial of a Person who was personally Involved in That Case
found here https://ip-lawyer-tools.com/no-contradiction-between-comvik-and-t1227-05-infineon/ Innovate888 (talk) 17:15, 26 October 2023 (UTC)