Talk:Gabriel Traversari

Untitled
Anyone else think this article reads like a vanity entry?
 * I don't. Callelinea (talk) 20:57, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Yes, it's obvious this dude wrote his own wiki page lol. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 43.249.130.117 (talk) 09:50, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Obvious vanity entry, hardly any valid links/sources, it should be removed — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.99.97.186 (talk) 13:12, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Gabriel Traversari. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080116044056/http://www-ni.laprensa.com.ni/cronologico/2004/agosto/12/revista/revista-20040812-04.html to http://www-ni.laprensa.com.ni/cronologico/2004/agosto/12/revista/revista-20040812-04.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110717185638/http://archivo.elnuevodiario.com.ni/2002/enero/25-enero-2002/variedades/variedades1.html to http://archivo.elnuevodiario.com.ni/2002/enero/25-enero-2002/variedades/variedades1.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071018040759/http://www.gabrieltraversari.com/ to http://www.gabrieltraversari.com/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070814001501/http://www.miamifilmfestival.com/doc_comp_gallery_2005.asp to http://www.miamifilmfestival.com/doc_comp_gallery_2005.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 23:03, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Doesn't meet WP:N guidelines?
Even if there was "significant" third-party notability (which there doesn't seem to have ever been....I remember coming to this article years ago and it was only the person that was the topic of the article that was insistent on it remaining up, to include being offended if readers mentioned his lack of notability and requested the article be reviewed for WP:N), external links and references look to be non-existent or archived/no longer in operation.

I think this article can safely be removed from Wikipedia. 2600:1702:4850:2CD0:CDEE:69CA:1112:AED3 (talk) 16:14, 14 November 2022 (UTC)