Talk:Gadsden Mall

Prod removal
The prod was removed on the basis that "this is a regional mall with more than 500,000 square feet of retail space". Apparently, by being 503,000 feet, it meets that editor's standard. I was unaware that that was our guideline -- most such malls of under 1 million square feet, I have been told, have the usual outcome of it being agreed that they do not warrant a stand-alone article. Where might I find the above-indicated approach supported? Thanks.--Epeefleche (talk) 23:46, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I've handed a selection of article from reliable sources to improve verifiability and meet the notability thresholds. This article could be expanded significantly by a motivated editor using these sources. - Dravecky (talk) 07:37, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks. That's great.  Beautiful work.  Any thoughts as to my questions?--Epeefleche (talk) 08:52, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
 * As I indicated in the other thread, that's been my experience when US shopping mall articles are taken to AfD. These are regional malls, the only or primary enclosed shopping center in a large geographical area, garnering significant ongoing attention from the news media. Even if coverage were to wane or cease (or the mall shut down), notability is not temporary. - Dravecky (talk) 09:20, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gadsden Mall. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110809102624/http://preit.com/leasing/detail/plans/37 to http://www.preit.com/leasing/detail/plans/37

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 05:10, 7 January 2017 (UTC)