Talk:Gagged (EP)

Use of Female Pronouns
Hello, I created the article, and used female pronouns when referring to Violet Chachki as that was the language used by the sources. If you feel like this should be changed, please let me know. Thank you in advance. Aoba47 (talk) 15:24, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Your reasoning seems appropriate. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 00:18, 15 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Thank you! Aoba47 (talk) 00:20, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Requested move 26 October 2021

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: not moved. There is a clear consensus that the current primary redirect to Gag is justified. (closed by non-admin page mover) Lennart97 (talk) 16:35, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

Gagged (EP) → Gagged – There is no other article with this title. Tree Critter (talk) 15:31, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
 * This is a contested technical request (permalink).  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 19:38, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * That doesn't mean gagged shouldn't be a WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT to Gag, as it currently is. I'm personally not sure, but I can't see this move as uncontroversial in any case. Lennart97 (talk) 15:56, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Definitely not uncontroversial, because the argument could be made that the primary meaning of gagged is the past tense of gag rather than the name of the record, regardless of exact match. Dr. Vogel (talk) 17:26, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Oppose per the long-term significance of Gag and the EP has 49 views compared with 4,930 for Gag.  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 19:38, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Oppose, the current primary redirect is justified. The exact title match does not guarantee a primary topic, see also related discussion at Talk:Without (The X-Files). 162 etc. (talk) 20:43, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Oppose. To be completely transparent, I created this article in 2016 (and I cannot believe it has been that many years ago) and I believe I am the primary contributor for this article. I understand the nominator's rationale, but I agree with the oppose arguments. I do not think this is the primary topic. I think more readers would be looking for the gag article and would be astonished to be directed to an article on a rather obscure EP. It makes more sense to me to have gagged remain a WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT to gag. Aoba47 (talk) 23:03, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
 * I suppose my thought process is that Gag has multiple issues and a grand total of three references, and has for the past several years, meanwhile Gagged is a GA that could have a hatnote. I understand Talk:Without (The X-Files), I actually probably should have put discuss=no for that one, but I personally feel Gag can hardly stand on its own three references enough to have Gagged be a primary topic redirect to it. It'd be more justifiable to me if Gag saw a big revamp. Tree Critter (talk) 03:43, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Oppose. The EP is clearly not the primary topic. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:32, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Oppose. The WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT to Gag is far more appropriate. Tigger Jay&thinsp; (talk)  16:06, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Oppose. The WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT to Gag is correct. no more technical requests of this sort please. In ictu oculi (talk) 20:56, 28 October 2021 (UTC)