Talk:Gaius Cassius Longinus 2

title
Just a suggestion: The title of the article sort of flies in the face of Wikipedia convention, and the numbering of 1 or 2 seems somewhat arbitrary. I'd have to look around some more to see how Wikipedians usually make this kind of distinction, but I think a title like "Gaius Cassius Longinus (Consul, 73 BC)" is more keeping with the Wikipedia convetions. Perhaps the article could/should be moved to a title such as that? - Vedexent 12:29, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Agree with merger
I created the article Gaius Cassius Longinus 2 and agree that it should be merged with Gaius Cassius Longinus (consul 73 BC). I have now tried to do that (without adopting unsupported information in the latter article), and I propose that this article here should be deleted. Xiphophilos 23:19, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Gaius Cassius Longinus 2

 * I have added a "" template to the article Gaius Cassius Longinus 2, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the   notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.

The above by user:Xiphophilos as commentary on the article page, is inappropriate and talk page content, I have removed it. 132.205.44.134 22:42, 3 May 2007 (UTC)