Talk:Galapagos shark/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Hi, I am reviewing this article for GA. I have gone through the article and made a few minor copy editing changes. I disambiguated a wikilink, hopefully correctly. In my opinion, this is a fine article and clearly meets the GA criteria. &mdash; Mattisse (Talk) 14:42, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): Clearly written b (MoS): Follows MoS
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): Well referenced b (citations to reliable sources): The sources are various and reliable  c (OR): No OR
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): Addresses the major aspects b (focused): Remains focused on subject of article
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias: NPOV
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Congratulations!
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Congratulations!
 * Congratulations!
 * Congratulations!

&mdash; Mattisse (Talk) 14:42, 3 May 2009 (UTC)