Talk:Galarian Corsola

Should the scope of the page be expanded?
Corsola is a single Pokémon species, with Galarian Corsola just being a variety. In my opinion it seems a little strange to limit the scope of the article to just the Galarian form. After all, if Galarian Corsola is notable, then by definition Corsola is too. I think it would make sense to move the page to Corsola and include more information about the species as a whole, even if the main focus is on the Galarian form because of the number of sources. Does anyone else have any opinions on this? Di (they-them) (talk) 04:14, 8 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Update: I think that to justify expanding this page's scope, I should try to find some reliable sources about normal Corsola as well. So here's what I've found so far.
 * https://www.ign.com/articles/2017/10/18/i-flew-1750-miles-to-catch-a-pokemon (an IGN article about completionism relating to Corsola being region locked in Pokémon Go)
 * https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidthier/2017/08/07/if-anything-pokemon-go-needs-way-more-regional-exclusives/ (a Forbes article discussing Pokémon Go's region locked Pokémon with Corsola being the primary example)
 * So it seems that there's at least some discussion of non-Galarian Corsola in RS that might justify expanding. Di (they-them) (talk) 04:44, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
 * The first article really only gives maybe a sentence of commentary, while the second is more discussing regional Pokémon as a whole more than Corsola. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 16:47, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
 * All of the discussion around Corsola is around Galarian Corsola exclusively. Anything else I found while looking into Corsola was pretty trivial and/or minor, and due to how distinct the coverage is between them it very much feels like it would come down to a WP:COATRACK situation, where main Corsola is used to buff Galarian Corsola's notability despite Corsola itself not being notable. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 16:47, 8 June 2024 (UTC)