Talk:Galaxy 15

Untitled
http://news.yahoo.com/s/space/20100503/sc_space/outofcontrolsatellitethreatensothernearbyspacecraft

Interactive Illustration of Satellite Neighborhood for Galaxy 15
Orbital neighborhood where Galaxy 15 will pass.Twpyle (talk) 12:02, 11 May 2010 (UTC)


 * That's just SES birds. Lyngsat has info on many more communications satellites.


 * Meanwhile, can Galaxy 15 really be said to be geostationary now? :-)&mdash;Dah31 (talk) 04:28, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Banner at top of article
The article has a banner reading "This article contains orbital elements but does not include an epoch, or date when those elements, which typically vary over time, were correct. Please help by adding the epoch for the current data, or changing the orbital elements to ones with a known epoch." From my reading of the article, every reference to an orbital position has a date context. Please provide any specific cases where the concern of the banner is met, or I will remove the banner shortly. Savlonn (talk) 10:44, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Template removed. Savlonn (talk) 15:52, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Galaxy 15 longitude?
Galaxy 15 longitude is said to be "133° West" in the first paragraph of this article, "93° West" in the infobox, and "72 degrees-W" in the NASA NSSDC Catalog ([]). Too much values for one longitude? --Utma Falos (talk) 02:02, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Galaxy 15. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100917231459/http://arianespace.com/images/launch-kits/launch-kit-pdf-eng/05_oct_13.pdf to http://www.arianespace.com/images/launch-kits/launch-kit-pdf-eng/05_oct_13.pdf
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.spacenews.com/satellite_telecom/100408-intelsat-loses-contact-galaxy-satellite.html
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.spacenews.com/satellite_telecom/orbital-blames-galaxy-failure-solar-storm-discloses-further-taurus-delay.html
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.spacenews.com/satellite_telecom/100430-galaxy15-still-adrift-poses-threat.html
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.spacenews.com/satellite_telecom/100603-intelsat-ses-negotiate-wayward-craft.html
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.intelsat.com/resources/galaxy-15/FAQs.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 09:32, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Galaxy 15. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110727142321/http://www.gpsworld.com/gnss-system/augmentation-assistance/news/waas-prn-135-resumes-normal-operation-11243 to http://www.gpsworld.com/gnss-system/augmentation-assistance/news/waas-prn-135-resumes-normal-operation-11243

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 07:04, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Conplan 8888?
"Zombie satellites can be classified as SZ's, however they pose no danger to humans (unless they conduct an unplanned de-orbit). Typically, zombie satellites only pose a threat the SATCOM services like DirectTV (Refer to Galaxy 15 incident-May 2010)"

A statement from Conplan 8888 Wikitrumpets (talk) 00:53, 13 August 2020 (UTC)