Talk:Galaxy IV

Failure *not* caused by "tin whiskers"?
The NASA web page at http://nepp.nasa.gov/whisker/failures/ states that the Galaxy IV failure was explicitly *not* due to tin whiskers. This seems to contradict the cited reference. Comments? 86.7.30.217 (talk) 20:54, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

On closer examination, the NASA page states that the primary systems did not fail due to tin whiskers, but the backup system did. 86.7.30.217 (talk) 13:17, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Galaxy IV. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
 * Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.wirelessweek.com/article.aspx?id=104090

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 07:14, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Galaxy IV. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080914094009/http://www.boeing.com/defense-space/space/bss/panamsat/statement.html to http://www.boeing.com/defense-space/space/bss/panamsat/statement.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 08:56, 8 November 2017 (UTC)