Talk:Galeon/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: WilliamThweatt (talk · contribs) 23:31, 9 June 2012 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

This article has some considerable shortcomings with respect to the good article criteria.
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * There are errors in English grammar (especially in the lede) and some otherwise odd usage throughout.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * There appear to be a few cited sources which are independent and reliable third party sources but sites like this and this appear to be just forums. See WP:Reliable Sources in general, and WP:USERG specifically.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * The whole article seems to be heavy on praise for the subject, the only criticism mentioned is a six word sentence at the end of the article. I'm sure there were critics and/or negative reviews by at least some.
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * I wouldn't fail an GA nom solely for lack of images, but a web browser does have a visual component that could be represented by more that just a screenshot in the infobox
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * There is still quite a bit of work that needs to be done in the areas of copyediting and referencing to reliable, independent, third party sources. Good luck improving the article.
 * Pass/Fail:
 * There is still quite a bit of work that needs to be done in the areas of copyediting and referencing to reliable, independent, third party sources. Good luck improving the article.