Talk:Galilee Basin

climate council
an interesting report that sheds a whole different light http://www.climatecouncil.org.au/uploads/af9ceab751ba2d0d3986ee39e1ef04fd.pdf Gnangarra 05:04, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Galilee Basin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120701115536/http://hancockcoal.com.au:80/go/current-projects/kevin-s-corner to http://hancockcoal.com.au/go/current-projects/kevin-s-corner
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130114073048/http://www.environment.gov.au:80/parks/nrs/science/capad/2010/pubs/capad10_qld.xlsx to http://www.environment.gov.au/parks/nrs/science/capad/2010/pubs/capad10_qld.xlsx
 * Added tag to http://www.northernargus.com.au/news/national/national/general/palmer-project-under-pressure-after-40b-purchase-contract-cancelled/2552508.aspx
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120513182800/http://www.waratahcoal.com/china-first-coal-project.htm to http://www.waratahcoal.com/china-first-coal-project.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150919231015/http://www.statedevelopment.qld.gov.au:80/major-projects/expanding-the-port-of-abbot-point.html to http://www.statedevelopment.qld.gov.au/major-projects/expanding-the-port-of-abbot-point.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120429051210/http://www.deedi.qld.gov.au:80/cg/galilee-basin-power-station.html to http://www.deedi.qld.gov.au/cg/galilee-basin-power-station.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 11:07, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Coal Quality
The paragraph under "Coal Quality" begins: "Galilee Basin coal quality indicates a premium-quality low sulphur and low ash thermal product" (i.e. high in energy and low in ash) and ends: "its energy content is about 18% below Australian benchmark coal and its ash content is about double that of the benchmark" (i.e. low in energy and high in ash).

I really think this contradiction needs to be resolved. Peter Bell (talk) 03:24, 1 December 2017 (UTC)