Talk:Galloway's Plan of Union

I dont understand what was the petition signed by the king that allowed colonists to have certain freedoms —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.121.245.234 (talk) 23:46, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Further clarification is needed regarding a couple points. First, if the Suffolk Resolves were endorsed on Sept. 17, reiterated in pan-Colonial form in the Declarations on Oct. 14, and enforced via the creation of the Continental Association on Oct. 22, why was Galloway's plan not rejected until Oct. 22? And if there were 56 delegates to the Congress, how is it that the Plan was rejected "5 to 6"? Vincent pearse (talk) 16:12, 7 March 2010 (UTC)


 * With regard to your last question, voting in Congress was by colony not by individual members. Lord Cornwallis (talk) 17:21, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Galloway's Plan of Union. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150402104121/http://www.ushistory.org/declaration/related/planforunion.htm to http://www.ushistory.org/declaration/related/planforunion.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 12:57, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Britain's response
There's no mention of what the British government in London thought of the plan, or if it had a chance of being accepted by Parliament even if the colonies had passed the plan. - BilCat (talk) 21:48, 12 June 2018 (UTC)