Talk:Gallox Bridge, Dunster/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 20:51, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

I'll have this one to you within a day ☠ JAG  UAR  ☠ 20:51, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. Has an appropriate reference section:
 * B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

Initial comments

 * "The bridge is in the guardianship of English Heritage" - this is mentioned in the lead but not anywhere else in the article
 * Added at the end of history.&mdash; Rod talk 18:06, 28 April 2015 (UTC)


 * "below 'the castle at a point" - would be better linked fully as Dunster Castle
 * Done.&mdash; Rod talk 18:06, 28 April 2015 (UTC)


 * The lead could be expanded slightly in order to summarise the article and comply per WP:LEAD. A little bit more can be mentioned about the bridge's history I think, for example "It was important for the transport of wool and other goods to market" could be expanded a little into how it dates back to 1222 and when the bridge was built etc
 * It already says 15th century for the construction but I've added a few words as suggested.&mdash; Rod talk 18:06, 28 April 2015 (UTC)


 * The Architecture section is a little short to pass the GA criteria, can it at all be expanded? By a sentence or two?
 * I'm still looking for more to add here.&mdash; Rod talk 18:06, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
 * I've been back through the sources and added a few words, but I really can't find anything else on the architecture.&mdash; Rod talk 17:40, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

On hold
This is a well researched article and a compact one too. It is well written but I feel that it does not meet the comprehensivness part of the crtiera at this time, so I'll put this on hold until all of the above can be addressed. Thanks! ☠ JAG  UAR  ☠ 12:00, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Close - promoted
Thank you for taking the time to make improvements to this article, I think the architecture should be fine as I see the rest of the article is well researched and well written, so I think this passes the GA criteria. Well done on the extra work, looks like another Somerset GA! ☩  JAG  UAR  ☩ 17:49, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Just looked at the picture again and I've crossed this bridge several times! ☩ JAG  UAR  ☩ 17:51, 29 April 2015 (UTC)