Talk:Galvanize

Contested deletion
This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --Dkseomarketing (talk) 23:50, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

It's a company that exists and is related to content in Wikipedia commons
 * The mere existence of a company does not merit it an article on Wikipedia, please review the notability guidelines for companies. Your username also suggests that you are a paid representative of the company (which is a severe conflict of interest) which is involved in "search engine optimization".  As a paid representative you are required by Wikipedia's Terms of Use to comply with the paid editing policy. Note that promotion is not permitted here. 331dot (talk) 23:52, 22 November 2016 (UTC)


 * , I agree with that there are issues here with notability and COI. First and foremost is the COI issue. Also, if / when it is determined to be sufficiently notable, it should be differentiated from the word "Galvanize"


 * I have been working old items in the Special:NewPagesFeed and came across this article. It looks like it used to be a redirect to Galvanization - and an was started article for a company called "Galvanize, Inc." I do find sources in HighBeam and google news that make it a stronger candidate than I first expected.


 * In the meantime, is the correct action, 331dot, to return it to a redirect?-- CaroleHenson (talk) 00:04, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I think it already has been(and I do believe that to be correct). 331dot (talk) 00:08, 23 November 2016 (UTC)