Talk:Gambia–India relations

Requested move 13 March 2018

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: all pages moved as requested per the discussion below. Dekimasu よ! 05:03, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

– It is presumed that [The Gambia–India relations] follows The Gambia. This RM covers all the pages of Category:Bilateral relations of the Gambia. But I looked for a counterexample The Bahamas. The pages of Category:Bilateral relations of the Bahamas use Bahamas. Sawol (talk) 07:55, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
 * The Gambia–India relations → Gambia–India relations
 * China–the Gambia relations‎ → China–Gambia relations‎


 * Hey! Don't forget these!
 * The Gambia–Iran relations → Gambia–Iran relations‎
 * The Gambia–Malaysia relations → Gambia–Malaysia relations‎
 * The Gambia–North Korea relations → Gambia–North Korea relations‎
 * The Gambia–Philippines relations → Gambia–Philippines relations‎
 * The Gambia–Russia relations → Gambia–Russia relations‎
 * The Gambia–Taiwan relations → Gambia–Taiwan relations‎
 * The Gambia–United States relations → Gambia–United States relations‎
 * But yeah, I support these moves per the nom's reasons above. It just reads cleaner. Paintspot Infez (talk) 12:05, 13 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Support, including those listed by Paintspot. Dicklyon (talk) 04:23, 20 March 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

There is a problem with this move request: none of the co-nominated articles had any sort of notice that a page move was in progress. I can assume that the three editors above and who performed the moves felt it was unlikely to be controversial to remove "The" from the page titles. That's probably true and requesting a revert of the moves solely due to the missing notice would be ignoring WP:NOTBURO. That said, I feel that it is important that notices for moves of co-nominated articles are not omitted in the future. Not everyone watches WP:RM, after all. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 14:59, 20 March 2018 (UTC)