Talk:Game & Wario/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Cukie Gherkin (talk · contribs) 16:54, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

(Criteria marked are unassessed)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):
 * b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a. (reference section):
 * b. (citations to reliable sources):
 * c. (OR):
 * d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a. (major aspects):
 * b. (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a. (major aspects):
 * b. (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * Pass/fail:

Infobox


 * 1) Australian release date is uncited and unmentioned outside of the infobox.
 * Cut, I never cite these anyways


 * 1) Most of the staff is uncited and unincorporated into the article. Either remove them or include them in the article with citations.
 * Similar concerns I left a comment about in my other reviews, so I await your recommendation

Gameplay


 * 1) At a glance, my biggest concern with this article is the fact that all the minigames are listed. I'm not really convinced that the minigames in this are notable enough to go into detail about how they operate. In my opinion, it would be better to discuss a handful of minigames as examples of the Game Pad gimmicks (cited by RS to demonstrate that these are more notable gimmicks). So, for instance, you could use Gamer as one of the examples because, well, it's considerably more well-known.
 * Great! I'll happily cut this down.


 * 1) "More minigames are unlocked as you progress through the game, as well as different game modes and difficulty settings within them." Is this saying that you unlock different game modes and difficulty settings, or is it saying that they have them?
 * Clarified

Development


 * 1) "announced to release June 23." feels redundant since the release date is mentioned later in the paragraph. Maybe if the initial release was delayed, but that's not the case here.
 * Unredundanted

Images


 * 1) Screenshot pair should have a specific rationale.
 * Specified

Just so you know I'm a touch busy rn so I'll be back to reviewing this in a day or two. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 20:43, 30 July 2023 (UTC)


 * , it has been two weeks since you said you would be returning to this within a day or two. Can you please return to it, or if you are busy IRL, provide an updated timeframe for when you will do so? &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 09:10, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * I have been busy, but I've completed the review. The remaining issues were small errors that I fixed. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 12:41, 13 August 2023 (UTC)