Talk:Gamma-ray generation

Contested deletion
This page should not be speedily deleted. I came here from the AN/I discussion. Except for one paragraph, I didn't spot any problems. Any copyright violations can be dealt with by rewriting. Count Iblis (talk) 21:49, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This page should not be speedily deleted because...

It seems a good physics article containing perfectly good and well-accepted mechanisms for gamma ray generation. There has been a great deal of hoopla over material introduced by the author, but so far as I can tell, much of this material is not contrversial, and I cannot immediately identify any copyright violations (I'm looking at sources). S B Harris 21:52, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Article stripped back to intro
Alas, the Marshallsumter mess is, in my opinion, too egregious to do anything other than to consider everything tainted unless we're sure it's been written entirely by other people.

I've gone over this diff between the point at which Marshallsumter stopped editing, and the point at which other editors' substantial contributions stopped, and taken just the introductory material which definitely seems not to have been generated by Marshallsumter, which seems to me to be both a good introduction to the topic, and also to be a good start to a stub article. -- The Anome (talk) 16:28, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Changed to a redirect
After some more research into this, Gamma ray does all that the above introduction did, and better, so I've changed this article into a redirect there. I suggest improving it. If it gets too long, it can be split out into its own article. -- The Anome (talk) 16:53, 13 September 2011 (UTC)