Talk:Gamma Trianguli Australis

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gamma Trianguli Australis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090628101130/http://www.fotw.net/flags/br_astro.html to http://www.fotw.net/flags/br_astro.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 16:59, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Radius
That value for the stellar radius is oddly large for a star of this type. Just sayin'. I did confirm that is the value listed in the paper. Praemonitus (talk) 22:36, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
 * The radius is large for an early A main sequence star, so is the luminosity and mass. They all correspond to an evolved star, previously a mid-B main sequence star.  Gray (1987) did classify it as A1 III, but mostly it has been classified as main sequence.  Sometimes as chemically peculiar although Brandi (1973) explicitly says "not chemically peculiar". Lithopsian (talk) 10:01, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

"Gatria" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gatria&redirect=no Gatria] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 19:48, 22 February 2024 (UTC)