Talk:Gannett/Archives/2017

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Gannett Company. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121011013154/http://www.abc15.com:80/dpp/news/region_phoenix_metro/central_phoenix/dish-customers-may-lose-gannett-programming-including-12-news-kpnx-over-autohop-feature to http://www.abc15.com/dpp/news/region_phoenix_metro/central_phoenix/dish-customers-may-lose-gannett-programming-including-12-news-kpnx-over-autohop-feature
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131006031910/http://www.gannett.com/article/99999999/PRESSRELEASES15/100721029/Gannett-completes-purchase-of-Army-Times-Publishing-Co. to http://www.gannett.com/article/99999999/PRESSRELEASES15/100721029/Gannett-completes-purchase-of-Army-Times-Publishing-Co.

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 20:36, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

NPOV
An anonymous editor has been consistently adding this text "; however, it doesn't make enough money to employ 80 people in New Jersey. Gannett is known for its consistent layoffs and shitty newspaper quality. The business model is corporate takeover of local newspapers and the bastardization of all of their content." This text does not merit addition to the article for several reasons. The first sentence is not necessary. When a large company employing 2400 people fires 80, it is not necessary in the lede. The rest is not written from the WP:NPOV required, and uncited. To avoid edit warring, I am stating my reasons for reverting here. Eddie891 (talk) 14:46, 14 June 2017 (UTC)