Talk:Gao Lishi

Feng Yuanyi ref
I believe the source is reliable. Contrary to what Nlu said, the website (to-u.hk) seems to be a sub-organisation of the Hong Kong Federation of Trade Unions in New Territories East. It appears to be an essay rather than a blogpost, since it is listed under the '潮人潮物' heading and not the '精選blog' heading. Still, I'll see what everyone else thinks.  Kayau  Voting  IS   evil 06:14, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for responding, Kayau. To be more specific, this is what I removed as (in my mind) not reliable as a source for the assertion that Gao Lishi's original name was Feng Yuanyi:
 * --Nlu (talk) 06:18, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Also note that the zh article also says Feng Yuanyi.  Kayau  Voting  IS   evil 07:10, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
 * ...but also doesn't cite a source for that proposition. I've looked online; it appears that there are a lot of sites that say Feng Yuanyi but none that cites any source whatsoever.  It makes me wonder whether this is one of those "one fictional source put it in and then everybody else followed it" situations.  --Nlu (talk) 17:35, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
 * This source is reliable (#6 for credibility and recommended by schools).  Kayau  Voting  IS   evil 13:19, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
 * But this is not a news article, per se. If it were, I'd agree that the source is sufficiently credible.  But all Chinese language newspapers (not just Hong Kong ones; Taiwanese ones are just as bad) are nowhere as good with their fact-checking in their "secondary pages" (副刊), because they consider it literature rather than news.  I still don't consider it sufficiently credible, but if you want to, go ahead and add it back.  I just find it curious that none of these pages that state this purported fact even mentioned where it came from.  --Nlu (talk) 16:04, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
 * But this is not a news article, per se. If it were, I'd agree that the source is sufficiently credible.  But all Chinese language newspapers (not just Hong Kong ones; Taiwanese ones are just as bad) are nowhere as good with their fact-checking in their "secondary pages" (副刊), because they consider it literature rather than news.  I still don't consider it sufficiently credible, but if you want to, go ahead and add it back.  I just find it curious that none of these pages that state this purported fact even mentioned where it came from.  --Nlu (talk) 16:04, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Gao Lishi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080410072336/http://www.sidneyluo.net/a/a16/184.htm to http://www.sidneyluo.net/a/a16/184.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080408054223/http://www.sidneyluo.net/a/a17/207.htm to http://www.sidneyluo.net/a/a17/207.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 21:02, 10 October 2017 (UTC)