Talk:Garbage Museum/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Zanimum (talk · contribs) 21:54, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

This is too weird a subject not to review. How many times can one review an article about a garbage museum? -- Zanimum (talk) 21:54, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

This sounds like it was (and could be again, if it got a few hundred more in funding) a great institution. Sad that it's not running currently.

Passing "Lead", "References", "External links".

Operation
 * "which transported recyclables" is the SCRC itself no longer active?

Exhibits
 * "Educational exhibits focus on the benefits of recycling soda cans reduces air pollution and water pollution than mining bauxite." I think you need a comma or two, and a joining word or two. This all seems to run into itself.
 * Sorry, am I reading that correct, that someone worked 9 months on a $2000 project? Was that just $2000 for the labour? Or just the materials? If that's both labour and materials, that's crazy.

Closure
 * "funded two 2.5 full-time positions" doesn't make sense. 2 makes sense, 2.5 makes sense not 2 2.5.

You had a cat for the disestablishment, I've added one for the establishment. -- Zanimum (talk) 12:37, 17 June 2014 (UTC)


 * I've fixed these things myself. Passing. --  Zanimum (talk) 23:57, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Sorry, was on vacation! ChrisGualtieri (talk) 02:36, 18 July 2014 (UTC)