Talk:Gardenburger

Needs more references
A quick google search turned up this

good luck! --Rocksanddirt 23:53, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * a notice that they filed for bankrupcy in 2005. Seems relevant to the article.
 * - regarding Steve Milloy the junkscience.com guy.
 * - something on the inventor.

Requested move 26 July 2020

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: not moved --  JHunterJ (talk) 12:56, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

– The disambiguation page includes only two entries: this article and veggie burger. I believe that this is allowed per WP:2DABS because I do not think either one of the entry is a primary topic. The Wiktionary entry implies that the term "gardenburger" can refer to either the brand name or any arbitrary veggie burger. The wiki article for hamburger mentions the term "garden burger" to indicate an arbitrary veggie burger. I do not think either usages is popular enough to dominate the other and be the primary topic. FunnyMath (talk) 06:11, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Gardenburger → Gardenburger (brand)
 * Gardenburger (disambiguation) → Gardenburger

– I note that this case is similar for the disambiguation page for Tylenol. FunnyMath (talk) 06:12, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Oppose For uses of Gardenburger without a space the brand seems to be the primary topic (and the only example really coming up). Whether in Google books, news or search, pretty much all results seem to be about the brand.--Yaksar (let's chat) 07:36, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Oppose per WP:OVERPRECISION. Gardenburger is primarily a brand name for their products, and veggie burgers are primarily known as veggie burgers. There's no title conflict. The hatnote should point to veggie burger and the dab page can be deleted. Station1 (talk) 18:22, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Not only is there a clear primary topic but there's no need for a disambiguation page at all. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:43, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Don't see any evidence this is better known as a generic trademark. And, even if it was, it would still be the primary topic (Xerox and Kleenex don't point to DABs because of photocopying and tissues). Nohomersryan (talk) 18:52, 26 July 2020 (UTC)


 * The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.