Talk:Garfield/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''
 * 1) lemsterboy

Concerns

Four citations required.

The site has already been warned twice for breeching fair use policy by adding actual garfield cartoon strips which will certainly be copyright protected. Despite this there are still cartoon stips on the site.

Removing some images and attempting to simply describe the cartoon strip does not give the site a quality feel.

Far too many references are simply from the official garfield website or to garfield cartoon strips.

If a direct quote from the cartoonist is to be used then an acknowledgment of it's source need to be given.

The article is overlong for the information it provides.

Lemsterboy (talk) 23:00, 15 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Checklist
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Reviewer: Lemsterboy (talk · contribs) 23:00, 15 September 2012 (UTC)