Talk:Garhi Sampla Uddar Gagan land case

Creating new as separate article is needed
This is a currently under investigation case in which earlier Punjab and Haryana High Court and Supreme Court of India have already passed the order to cancel the illegal acquisition of land. It is now further being investigated by the multiple agencies such as Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and Vigilance dept, with several people/entities being questioned including Bhupinder Singh Hooda and Udar gagan Properties Ltd, it can not be primarily merged with any of those due to several reason. Merging will distort WP:BALANCE of those articles while losing the key details. Besides there are several entities, both investigating agencies and people being investigated, it is not commonsensical to merge with one entity. As the case progresses, it might go to Supreme Court and may spawn off multiple cases and counter-cases, chargesheets, additional investigations by the current or more agencies, and so on.

Politically motivated supporters might try to have it deleted due to WP:COI WP:Systemic bias. Both, political supporters and opponents with WP:NPOV, might try to vandalise this article either by diluting or embellishing the facts.

Future editors: To keep the articles in adherence with WP:BLP, please add only the court related details such as court verdicts, submissions in the court. Refrain from adding content that is usually outside the court or investigating agencies, such as the opinion/noise of supporters and opponents, even if those are reported in the reputed newspapers.

Keep this as a separate article and please add it to your watch list to protect it from the biased editing and vandalism.

Thanks. 202.156.182.84 (talk) 20:38, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

False high rating by Earwig tool: Earwig's tool report falsely shows a high rating. The tool is matching the cited source with the sourced quote inside the wikipedia article, which is resulting into a flase high rating. There is no copyvio. Excluding this sourced and cited quote in the article, the tool rating drops significantly. Cited quotes are permissible as per wikipedia guidelines. Please ignore the false results by this tool. 202.156.182.84 (talk) 13:21, 15 March 2018 (UTC)