Talk:Garo (TV series)

Show Title
Isn't the correct title for this show "Ougon Kishi GARO" (黄金騎士ガロ), meaning Golden Knight Garo??? I am going to edit this later. Here is proof, if anyone's questioning this: http://www.bandaigames.channel.or.jp/list/ps2_garo/ Kaixaken 22:53, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah, correct it soon or I will stalk your nightmares D: 85.155.204.238 23:25, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

BTW, 牙狼 is "ga rou", not "kiba okami" as stated before. Kaixaken 15:37, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

I still don't get the reason why this page is called "Garo The Fanged Wolf". It makes sense if it was only referring to Saejima Taiga/Kouga and their Makai Knight title lineage. Kaixaken 19:20, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

No Pics
Aside from the thickness issue of the page, there isn't any pics on the web page. Can someone please add some nice pics to the GARO page?

Too Much Spoilers
I think some people would like to know about the show with the full details of the spoiles to save their time from watching. You might think "Well why watch it at all then!?", but people are busy and simply want to know a story than watching it. I read the movie spoilers to get the feel for a story myself. Why don't we just seperate the pages to reduce the size?

Even with a spoiler tag, there are too much spoilers in this article. The article will be trimmed to fit Wikipedia's filesize limit. Kaixaken 23:45, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

That, and the "minor info" section has too many things that only actually appeared in one or two episodes (i.e.: barchess, Glen Forest) --Aresef 03:14, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

Length
I always believed any small amount of info is helpful to anyone, perhaps we could simply move the materials in a seperate page to keep it at a certain page length. Eureka Seven and other anime pages gave out summarized versions and then had a seperate page for thicker detailed ones. How about that sort of format?

Okay, this page is too long, according to the warning I get when I go to edit. We need to cut some things, it seems.--Aresef 02:36, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, that warning is only a suggestion, the article doesn't have to be cut down or split up. However, there are many things that this article could do without, and several things it lacks. For instance, the "minor info" section doesn't seem very encyclopedic, could the significance of that be explained? In any case, this article needs more references.--Sean Black 02:47, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah, there are so many things in there that were only mentioned/used once then never again. --Aresef 19:15, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Recent bad page split
The (Tv Series) page is already about the 2005 TV series and a new page for it isn't really necessary just because it has a lot of spinoffs and sequels etc. Maybe franchise pages would be better? Ppk80 (talk) 23:05, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes! That was my original intention. There should be a separate article dedicated to the franchise. I feel it's sloppy and unorganized to have the 2005 series page also cover the rest of the sequels and spin-offs. It's like having the rest of the James bond sequels, spin-offs, imitations, etc. be also covered in the Dr. No article, there's separate articles for things like that. The 2005 Garo article should mainly focus on the 2005 series and a separate article should be made for the the sequels and spin-offs, appropriately titled Garo (franchise), a la Godzilla (franchise). Armegon (talk) 23:31, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Is there any way we can trim it down, and merge this back into another article? Boomer VialHolla! We gonna ball! 09:02, 14 March 2017 (UTC)