Talk:Garry Schyman/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: S Masters (talk) 17:11, 10 April 2010 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)

Summary: There are no issues with this article, and it passes all the requirements on the checklist. As such, I am happy to pass this as a Good Article. -- S Masters (talk) 17:27, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * Article is well written and complies to MoS.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * References appear to comply to WP:RS and all major statements are properly cited.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * The article appears to be stable.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Unfortunately there are no images available, however, this is not a requirement of GA.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: