Talk:Garth Ennis work for 2000 A.D./Judge Dredd

Bad idea?
I think this is a bad idea. There is no reason the list of 2000AD can't be accomodated within the actual bibliography. Splitting this off just disrupts the list requiring people to cut back and forth between the two. As I said on the talk page I want to make the list chronological not alphabetical and this is going to make that impossible. (Emperor 21:00, 31 May 2006 (UTC))


 * this is a terrible page and should be deleted. --Artw 21:50, 31 May 2006 (UTC)


 * As I said on there is a lot of goo information here but it should be in the other entry. If it goes that way then I'll sort it all out, format it right and slot it in the right places. (Emperor 02:35, 1 June 2006 (UTC))


 * And by "right places" you mean, exactly...? Rudá 19:14, 2 June 2006 (UTC)


 * In the bibliography of the Garth Ennis entry. See the talk page for further discussion of this. (Emperor 13:31, 7 June 2006 (UTC))