Talk:Gartner/Archives/2015

Better sources needed
This article is a disgrace. The third-party coverage largely is cited merely for its own existence, not for what it says about Gartner - unsurprising, since it does not say anything remotely useful about the company. Instead, the Wikipedia article treats us to a "history" section whose only source is Warner Music Group's page on their management, a web page which does not even mention Gartner (and is not a reliable source anyway). If the mere size of the company were not an almost-guarantee for Wikipedia-style notability, I'd nominate the entire article for deletion. Instead I'll just remove some unreferenced hype and useless "sources". Huon (talk) 21:29, 6 March 2015 (UTC)