Talk:Gary Sambrook

Semi-protected edit request on 26 October 2020
✅

In the section 'In October 2020, Sambrook voted against extending free school meals to eligible children during school holidays.[6] This could have helped over 6,000 children within his constituency.[7] In response, a vicious graffito appeared in his constituency reading "Gary Sambrook eats big dinners".[8]' Remove the unnecessary word 'vicious' as it is subjective and there is no evidence to support it. Philistine055 (talk) 21:40, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Removed. DuncanHill (talk) 22:01, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

Neutrality
"This could have helped over 6,000 children within his constituency" is not a neutral statement, given that it indicates that 6000 children went unhelped. That particular sentence should probably just be deleted. /Julle (talk) 23:30, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I'd normally have waited longer, but since this was a (perceived) POV problem in a BLP article, I went ahead and removed it now. Politics can always benefit one group or another; we normally don't indicate a decision as a refusal to help someone. /Julle (talk) 10:41, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Grammar
Please stop reverting simple grammar changes, if you require explaination of why grammar edits have been made, speak about it on the talk page before reversion.