Talk:Gate of Mercy Synagogue/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

I will review this article. Cirt (talk) 23:09, 10 December 2008 (UTC) Images used in this article:
 * Image review
 * File:Gate of Mercy Synagogue 3.jpg - Located on Wikimedia Commons. Taken by, checks out, and image page contains appropriate information. ✅. Cirt (talk) 07:09, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * File:Mumbai area locator map.svg - Located at Wikimedia Commons. Made by, will inquire further about this one.
 * Started a deletion discussion of this one at Commons - I am not certain that material from Google Maps can be licensed under "GFDL / Creative Commons - Share Alike", so hopefully this discussion will prove fruitful. Cirt (talk) 07:09, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

✅. Cirt (talk) 05:25, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Stability review
 * 1) Review of article's edit history reveals no problems or issues/disputes.
 * 2) Review of article's talk page history also shows no issues.

Good article nomination on hold
This article's Good Article promotion has been put on hold. During review, some issues were discovered that can be resolved without a major re-write. This is how the article, as of December 17, 2008, compares against the six good article criteria:


 * 1. Well written?: Pass. Written in clear and understandable wording.
 * 2. Factually accurate?: Pass. Duly cited throughout to WP:RS/WP:V secondary sources.
 * 3. Broad in coverage?: Not passing at this time. Issues remain to be addressed here.


 * Per WP:LEAD, the lede should be a summary of the article, and should stand alone as its own piece. Instead, the lede appears to introduce new information, not yet present later on in the article body itself.
 * The article and amount of references used seems a bit skimpy. Surely with a bit more research more sources can be found to incorporate into the article and expand it further with more info?
 * 4. Neutral point of view?: Pass. Article is written in a neutral, matter of fact tone.
 * 5. Article stability? Pass. See above.
 * 6. Images?: Pending. See above.

Please do not intersperse comments, but instead respond to above points, below. Thank you. Please address these matters soon and then leave a note here showing how they have been resolved. After 48 hours the article should be reviewed again. If these issues are not addressed within 7 days, the article may be failed without further notice. Thank you for your work so far. Cirt (talk) 06:46, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Will look around for more text. Difficult as when I went there, the place was padlocked. Am away till 2009 =Nichalp   «Talk»=  13:25, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Ah okay I'll wait a bit more. Cirt (talk) 13:31, 29 December 2008 (UTC)