Talk:Gateway Technology

Comments
The first paragraph in the 'Basic Steps' is a complete mess and makes no sense! The rest is correct.

74.60.93.26 (talk) 18:03, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

The claim that gateway cloning has replaced endonucleases and ligases is dubious. Most academic labs still use restriction endonucleases and ligases. This seems to be more of a marketing claim than a statement of fact regarding the frequency of gateway cloning usage in the molecular/cellular biology community. Other techniques like Gibson Assembly or Golden Gate Assembly are closer to replacing endonuclease and ligase cloning than is Gateway cloning. Atlantisiron (talk) 22:09, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Invitrogen and the name change
The article mentions "Invitrogen terminology". But Invitrogen no longer exists. Should this be reworded or should all mention of specific terminology removed? I specifically refer to sections such as " (special Invitrogen nomenclature)." Also, the article could need some visual makeup ... it's not easy to read right now. 84.112.136.52 (talk) 18:25, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Wouldn't a diagram be nice?
Briancady413 (talk) 20:43, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Recent Developments in Biotechnology
Hi, my name is Buse. I'm a Molecular Biology master student and editing the page was given to me as an assignment for Recent Developments in Biotechnology (MLC501) in Uskudar University.

outreachdashboard.wmflabs.org/courses/Uskudar_University,_Istanbul,_Turkiye/MLC501_Recent_Developments_in_Biotechnology_2022-2023_Fall_(2022-2023)/home Buse Baran (talk) 10:05, 26 January 2023 (UTC)