Talk:Gay Porn Studios

Please do not delete, I believe this page is important becasue it helps people understand the different studios available.Quinnzach 08:26, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The problem here is that we have a similar list already. Another problem is that the blurb on top reads like an advertisement. --Core des at talk! 07:19, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The numerous grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors make this article beyond cringeworthy.4.232.186.128 01:37, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I have taken the time to fix these problems up. Removed anything like I am trying to advertise for any studio and fixed up spelling. Professional removed from discription collum. I don't really like the idea of having all the porn studios together. Hetrosexual porn list of studios should have their own page.Quinnzach 08:24, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Merge
This list should definitely be merged into List of pornographic movie studios. The description collum in this article is just a tool for advertising and most does not follow NPOV. The list should be similar to the list of heterosexual studios found in the above article and merged together.
 * I think this article should not be merged as the content is different from that of mainstream and diserves it's own page. The page is not an advertisement for the studios, it gives people an idea what is available. There are many other pages in wikipedia that contain information about companys. The page also helps people compair different studios and to find what they are into, people can just view the free material and don't have to buy. The page isn't just a list of gay porn studios, more information can be added about the studios. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Quinnzach (talk • contribs) 01:47, 24 September 2006.
 * The content is actually the same. It is a list of pornographic film studios. The difference isn't even the genre. The other page is a list of ALL pornographic film studios while this article is a subset of that. Therefore, this article belongs in the main article. On top of that, we need to get the collum titled "Description". This is a definite abuse of NPOV. The page IS an advertisement for the studios when the description says something like "excellent studio". The studio name, which can be linked to an article about the studio once it's written, and the studio's website are all that are necessary.Stoneice02 05:57, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
 * NPOV abuse, I will fix this up. The discription collum is a really good ideal so people known if the studio makes black porn or amateur porn etc. I still think it should be kept seperate as gay porn studios are not mainstream studios, they diserve to be kept seperate from hetrosexual porn.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Quinnzach (talk • contribs) 02:11, 24 September 2006.
 * But the article I am trying to merge into isn't just mainstream studios, it is all pornographic studios. That page does not get into specific genres, neither should this one. Each page should have the same format to be consistant, and then should be merged, IMHO. Stoneice02 06:19, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The edits are better, but by calling some of the studios "professional" you're making it seem like the other studios are not professional, thereby still abusing NPOV. Stoneice02 06:22, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
 * See here for a preview of what I believe the new merged article should look like User:Stoneice02/Studio (I didn't include the full gay list because it requires some time that I don't want to spend until the merge is approved).
 * I don't like the idea, could we have two pages, your idea and my idea. I think having the table is important and gives people alot of information on what is produced out there in terms of themes like Bears/Amateur/Ethnic etc... People will be able to add more information in the future. The purpose is so that at a glance you can gain a lot of information about the different studios which your idea doesn't. If we do have two seperate pages, remove links to mine. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Quinnzach (talk • contribs) 22:08, 24 September 2006.
 * I'm not sure I follow what you mean by two pages. We can't have the same table in two different articles. If you want to give information about different studios, other than its name and website address, you can create an article on the studio. I think the way it is set up now is still border-line advertisement. Stoneice02 06:44, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Go a head and merge it. Quinnzach 08:19, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I have already merge it for you. Quinnzach 10:20, 25 September 2006 (UTC)